Diagnostic
HRC Campaign Director, Pollster and Blackwater Consultant Mark Penn
Salon gives us a little story that just explains all the problems with
HRC - entitled, tonedeaf and based in Hubris:
Be careful what you ask for
In an e-mail message sent to reporters Saturday, the Clinton
campaign asked, "Where Is the Bounce"? The answer: Right here.
Team Clinton based its message, in large part, on a
CNN/WMUR/University of New Hampshire poll, taken immediately after
the Iowa caucuses, that showed Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama
tied at 33 percent. While that tie represented four points of
improvement for Obama, the Clinton team noted that the poll's
margin of error meant that there had been "no statistically
significant change" in the candidates' numbers "before and after
the Iowa caucuses."
"Contrast that with the 17 points John Kerry gained in 2004 in the
Boston Globe poll ... in New Hampshire after the Iowa caucuses. Or
with the 7 points Al Gore gained in 2000 in the CNN/USA
Today/Gallup poll, increasing his lead in New Hampshire from 5
points to 18 points," the Clinton campaign said. "New Hampshire
voters are fiercely independent. They will make their own decisions
about who to support."
Maybe so. But a second CNN/WMUR/University of New Hampshire poll
was released Sunday, and that one shows Obama leading Clinton 39
percent to 29 percent. Add the 10 points by which Obama leads now
to the four points by which he trailed before Iowa, and you get a
14-point swing -- exactly the sort of Kerry/Gore bounce the Clinton
No comments:
Post a Comment