Sleep Lab Busted by Medicare
Sleep Review magazine reports that HMS Diagnostics Inc was recently
busted by CMS (Medicare) for having uncertified technicians run sleep
studies on Medicare patients:
Sleep Lab Medicare Claims Under Investigation
Accredited Sleep Disorder Center HMS Diagnostics Inc reports that it
has been the focus of an investigation by the US Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS), Office of Inspector General (OIG), and the
Federal Bureau of Investigation. Using what the company calls "a
requirement little known in the sleep diagnostics industry," the US
Attorney's Office is suggesting HMS Diagnostics Inc may have
improperly billed certain CPT codes for sleep tests that Medicare
should not have reimbursed and is seeking a large settlement.
According to the company, the US Attorney's Office in conjunction with
the HHS, the OIG, and the FBI, conducted a 10-month investigation of
HMS Diagnostics Inc. They have concluded that HMS Diagnostics Inc may
have improperly billed certain CPT codes for sleep tests that Medicare
should not have reimbursed. They stated that they believe submission
of those claims violated the False Claims Act, stating that the
technicians did not have the required certifications for billing CPT
98510 and CPT 98511 (42.CFR 410.33 c), HMS Diagnostics Inc says. The
claims that are being called a violation go back as far as January 1,
2002, and potentially involve substantial penalties.
John Goodman, president of HMS Diagnostics Inc, feels strongly that
very few people in the industry today are aware of this potentially
very serious situation. "We believe that the majority of labs think
the tech certification rules only just recently went into place, ie,
as of October 1, 2007. But in fact, according to CMS, the regulation
was actually published and effective since at least 2002." However,
from Goodman's perspective, he says, "My research indicates that these
regs were never spotlighted or otherwise highly advertised by the
government, which seems unbelievably unfair to us and everyone else in
the sleep industry."
The company says that its practices are consistent with those of other
accredited sleep centers that operated under the belief that certified
technicians were required to directly attend each patient as of
October 1, 2007 (not before this date). Upon receiving the result of
the investigation, HMS Diagnostics Inc says it has found numerous
articles about this requirement with dates as varied as February 26,
2007, October 1, 2007, and, January 1, 2008. The release claims that
date confusion and conflict are apparent and widespread in the
literature, legal opinions, and the regulations themselves.
There is also a requirement that states, "If a technician leaves the
company, if a new technician is hired or when a technician's license
expires and he obtains a renewal, the IDTF must provide this
information to the carrier on an amended 855B with attachment II.
Failure to do so may result in suspension of its Medicare provider
number."
According to the release, the US Attorney's Office seems to be
suggesting that any CPT 98510 or CPT 98511 study not actually
performed by a credentialed technician cannot be billed. The fact that
the credentialed technician is on site and supervising apparently is
not a factor, HMS Diagnostics stated in the release.
HMS Diagnostics Inc seeks to inform other well-intended diagnostic
facilities to pay extremely close attention to the potential pitfalls
that have been created by government regulations and their
interpretation by the government. "If what CMS is saying is true, then
the amount of money that would be owed to Medicare by the industry is
phenomenal," says Goodman. "The liability potential on an industry
such as ours with Medicare could be a very big number."
This is a disturbing development. The requirement for tech
certification is virtually unknown in the sleep community. On the AASM
message boards, we were recently discussing a new CMS regulation that
All studies are to be done by a certified polysomnographer by January
1, 2008 in Arkansas, Louisiana, Eastern Missouri, New Mexico, and
Oklahoma and by October 1, 2008 in Rhode Island; and the consensus was
that uncertified technicians were ok for the time being in most other
states. Most sleep labs have a combination of certified and
uncertified techs, and I agree with the article that if CMS is going
to enforce this newly discovered regulation, the amount of money owed
No comments:
Post a Comment