Diagnostic Laparoscopy
This means a laparoscopy that is scheduled to "look for things". There
is no reason outside of infertility to do the procedure.
I rarely perform a diagnostic laparoscopy. Why? Because I got tired of
doing them and finding nothing. As I consider diagnostic laparoscopy,
I think about the information I already have. Is the ultrasound
completely normal? Is there a history of pelvic infection? Is there a
history of pelvic pain? Is there a history of pelvic surgery? Is the
hysterogram normal? Some doctors will do a blood test for Chlamydia to
see if there was a past history of that infection.
If the answer to all of these questions is no, the odds of finding
something on laparoscopy is very low. Some reports say it's about 5%.
Before the comments come pouring in there are a few things to add.
First, a small amount of endometriosis will be identified in some
patients, but in most of those cases, it's not enough to shake a stick
at, and the laparoscopy will have been unnecessary. Second, there will
always be surprise cases, where pre-op everything was negative, and at
surgery there are adhesions and or endometriosis. I question some of
these cases. Were the pre-op tests reviewed carefully enough? For
example, a cyst of endometriosis(endometrioma) should be seen on the
pre-op ultrasound. Some of the cases are unquestionable; all was
negative but the surgery showed correctable findings. So here is the
balance question. Do many patients have unnecessary surgery to find
problems in a very few? If a diagnostic laparoscopy was recommended to
you, be sure to go over these issues with your doctor. Even a simple
laparoscopy can have unfortunate complications. It's not minor
No comments:
Post a Comment