Sunday, 10 February 2008

on evaluations cont



A Useful Diagnostic Tool: On Evaluations (cont.)

My experience departs markedly from that of the other good folk who

have commented on student evaluations. My department permits me the

latitude to design my own instrument. All of the questions I pose are

open ended, and they have all, at various times over the years,

provided me with good feedback. I use them to get suggestions how to

improve my lectures, to find out which assignments they thought they

learned most from, which books they felt they understood and which

not, which rubrics were helpful to them and which not, and so on.

I ask my students not just to answer the question posed, but also to

explain why they think as they do. I have received generous feedback

from them over the years, and have implemented many of the suggestions

that they have offered. I have found this feedback invaluable in

fine-tuning my teaching. I am, simply put, a better teacher because of

the useful commentary and criticism I have received from my students.

The notion, put forth by one recent commentator, that my students lack

the competence to judge my performance, is ludicrous. They are, if

anything, more finely aware of multimedia communication, and more

sophisticated at some of the modes of communication I use in my

classes, than I am. I would not trust them to judge my overall value

as a scholar and an intellectual, but I emphatically do trust them to

be able to make discriminating judgments about performance. This is

especially true of lectures before large numbers of students, which

certainly have a strong performative element to them. Student

evaluations are a diagnostic tool, and they have their weaknesses.

They should not be the sole instrument on which I rely to improve my

teaching. But the notion that they have no value at all is silly.

I see lots of my colleagues who get defensive about their student's

criticisms. It stings to have some thoughtless 19 year old tell us

they think we are lacking, especially given that most of us work quite

hard at our jobs. But we should not take their criticisms at face

value. They are well worth considering, it seems to me, if your agenda

in reading them is to figure out what you are doing right, and what

you might wish to improve. I do not think they provide the sole basis

on which I work to improve my teaching, but without them, I would be

unable to fine-tune my pedagogy anywhere near as effectively as I have

been able to do.

Newer Post Older Post Home

About RYS:

RYS is sexy and dynamic, and what it is today means nothing for

tomorrow. We hope that it will always be a teeming nation of

professorial dissent, and a cherished destination for the frustrated

and the inspired.

We value honesty and anonymity, and we hope that you'll say exactly

what you regret not saying at that grade appeal meeting earlier today,

or at that lunch with the Dean. There are no fences in the desert. And

the same yellow sun burns us all.

RYS Links

* Support the Red Cross.

* Email us your pain.

* Buy Prodo at Cafe Press.

* 2008 Calendar.

Blog Archive

* v 2008 (118)

+ v February (31)

o Some Advice For Professor Pansy. RYS Readers Rally...

o Another Word on Portfolios and Grades.

o Bonnie From Britain Offers Up a Mixed Bag of Ratin...

o One of Our Chief Correspondents Breaks Down the Su...

o Professor Pansy Has a Plan. We're Not Saying It's ...

o Arrogant Alvin Gets A Little Smackdown. Maybe He C...

o Where RYS Readers Play Pinata With the "I Wanna Be...

o Bridging the Gap Between Subjective and Objective....

o Another Newbie Asks This Week's Big Thirsty!

o Where "It's Not Rocket Science" Isn't A Good Comeb...

o Just One More Head Smacking Moment in the Academy....

o Professor Project Offers a Reply to Spreadsheet St...

o Enjoy the Flava Of Some Hot Links.

o On Familiarity and Academic Viability. (One of Our...

o Readers Don't Feel Bad for Fred from Flint. This W...

o Listen, If You're Going To Provide Your own Silly ...

o Our Favorite Student Athlete of the Week.

o Phil from Phoenix Does Not Have His Sights Set Inc...

o Sarah From Sausalito Sure Is Obsessed With Snappy ...

o Fred From Flint Is Fed Up.

o WW III

o When the Saracasm Gets Going, It's Tough To Stop I...

o We Prefer Going After Students With a Sock Full of...

o Spreadsheet Steve Stiffens His Resolve.

o Guess Who?

o A Long Time Reader Shows What It Means To Go "Old ...

o Delightful Dora from Detroit Dishes It Out. Why We...

o Where the Moderators Lose Their Minds and Give Up ...

o Usually, When We Get an Email From A [[BLANK]] It ...

o Marshall the Manipulator.

o Thirsty Replies for a Thirsty Nation.

+ |> January (87)

o An Early Reply To This Morning's Big Thirsty - Wha...

o The Big Thirsty - What Else Could You Do?

o Lessons on Hubris, and On Dissing the Mighty RYS W...

o Job Season Is Making Some Folks Crack.

o The Hoodie Rocks Like a Mofu!

o The First of a New Series. (Or A Blip That We Will...

o More, More, More Students Who Have Conspired to Ru...

o An RYS Portion of Hot Links.

o People Clamor for the T-Shirt!

o Wud It Be Ok if U Got Lost? One More Student We Ha...

o Head-Nodders, Laptop Kids, Winter Flip Floppers, a...

o So. Who Do You Hate Already? An Early Thirsty.

o Phucked.

o One of Our Readers Puts Aside Sunday Dinner In Ord...

o Pocket Protector Phil Tells Us What's Wrong with t...

o Smackdown for Sybil.

o Beowulf vs. the Engineers and Everyone Else Who Cr...

o Sybil from Saskatoon Is Searching for Some School ...

o Academic Haiku Friday.

* |> 2007 (614)

+ |> December (89)

+ |> November (79)

+ |> October (93)

+ |> September (53)

+ |> August (45)

+ |> July (13)

+ |> June (8)

+ |> May (74)

+ |> April (43)

+ |> March (39)

+ |> February (33)

+ |> January (45)

* |> 2006 (339)

+ |> December (44)

+ |> November (36)

+ |> October (37)

+ |> September (25)

+ |> August (8)

+ |> July (6)

+ |> June (8)

+ |> May (36)

+ |> April (27)

+ |> March (30)

+ |> February (32)

+ |> January (50)

* |> 2005 (46)

+ |> December (22)


No comments: